STAYLINK
Language
STAYLINK
Leave complexity to the system, focus time on partners and guest value. Distribution matrix · price corridors · automated settlement · transparent reconciliation.
StayLink began with hands-on hoteliers reflecting on peak/low seasons, price wars, and messy reconciliation. We learned that exposure ≠ bookings, cheap ≠ growth. The key is sending the right guest to the right room at the right price and letting the system run the process.
Build on channel distribution, dynamic pricing, risk & settlement, and end-to-end transparency to turn “awareness → conversion → repeat → cash flow” into a reusable system capability.
For partners, StayLink is like utilities—stable, trustworthy, predictable. No gimmicks, just accountable numbers.
Own site, alliance traffic, and private channels in sync. Weight by region/room type/time to route real guests to the right inventory.
Use corridors and blackout windows to avoid race-to-the-bottom, keeping RevPAR/ADR in a healthy band.
Orders are routed to designated accounts/devices by rule. Smoother pre-stay coordination and less manual follow-up.
Orders, splits, L1/L2 commissions, and withdrawals are fully traceable end-to-end; anomalies are flagged and exportable.
Flexible T+7 / T+14 cycles. Auto handling of discrepancy orders for stable, predictable cash flow.
RevPAR, occupancy, channel conversion, and repeat curves on one screen—every campaign is measurable and repeatable.
More spend and exposure didn’t lift stays. Root cause: channel mismatch and pricing strategy—not “insufficient budget.”
Reconciliation by sheets and shouting across teams led to delays and errors—so we encoded the rules into a system.
Cheaper isn’t always better. We protect brand equity and keep RevPAR/ADR within a healthy band.
When orders, splits, commissions, and cycles are transparent and auditable, collaboration gets simpler—StayLink was born.